Quarrel Forum

Doggy · #1 (**permalink**) 30 Jan 2005, 06:40

Is he a good one? I think he sucks, if you saw Michael Moore's film or read his books you sure should agree. He attack countries like a cowboy, clearing up his dad's mess. Finishing the job, all for the oil. Some fun-facts:

42% of his time he is on holiday.
He discusses things like World War's while golfing or hunting.
There was no evidence against Iraq and weapons of mass destruction, but he kept saying it. Was never found. Don't go on the ''they are hiding it''-tour cuz you would find it.
Germans captured france in 6 weeks. Americans more then 50 years later haven't got Iraq after a year. It's still full of terrorists.
Iraq should be connected to the Taliban and Al-Quada. Do you really think a dictator like Saddam would've led any other group in his country?? So that was all rubbish.

Don't go and tell me ''something had to be done against those poor people in Iraq'' Several people even stated they wanted Saddam back cuz they had propper water and food. Iraq is one big failure a 2nd Vietnam and that's only ONE of the things I'm talking about, that are caused by George W. Bush.

Shane · #2 (**permalink**) 30 Jan 2005, 07:29

bush is a arse, looks like a monkey, does a sh*t job
and so does the UK prime ministor

jadeka · #3 (**permalink**) 30 Jan 2005, 11:47

I cant say I like george W. bush but I would like to remark something about this:

Quote:

Germans captured france in 6 weeks. Americans more then 50 years later haven't got Iraq after a year. It's still full of terrorists.

the germans did maybe capture france in 6 weeks but those whole 5 years the french underground resistance also fought the germans, to the germans the resistance would've been like the modernday terrorists in iraq, only with a little difference that I think the french had good cause for it and the terrorists in iraq dont.

-jadeka

weirdkitten · #4 (**permalink**) 30 Jan 2005, 15:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doggy

Is he a good one? I think he sucks, if you saw Michael Moore's film or read his books you sure should agree. He attack countries like a cowboy, clearing up his dad's mess. Finishing the job, all for the oil. Some fun-facts:

42% of his time he is on holiday.
He discusses things like World War's while golfing or hunting.
There was no evidence against Iraq and weapons of mass destruction, but he kept saying it. Was never found. Don't go on the ''they are hiding it''-tour cuz you would find it.
Germans captured france in 6 weeks. Americans more then 50 years later haven't got Iraq after a year. It's still full of terrorists.
Iraq should be connected to the Taliban and Al-Quada. Do you really think a dictator like Saddam would've led any other group in his country?? So that was all rubbish.

Don't go and tell me ''something had to be done against those poor people in Iraq'' Several people even stated they wanted Saddam back cuz they had propper water and food. Iraq is one big failure a 2nd Vietnam and that's only ONE of the things I'm talking about, that are caused by George W. Bush.

1. Michael Moore, is a RICH FAT WHITE GUY. Which liberals hate all three things, except when they are bashing a republican. Also he menipulated the facts and interviews. There are several videos out there that show the entire interview and they clearly show that michael more twisted their words

2. 42% on vacation, but working vacations, he works while at the ranch, he works while at Camp David. He takes Officials from other countries there and talks with them about issues, he just dosnet sit around doing nothing.

3. So what if he talks about wars while hunting and fishing? he can if he wishes to. you talk about stuff while doing things you like

4. We know Iraq had WMD's becuase we gave them some. Early on during the war we found some war heads that were used to store chemical weapons.

5. The Germans went and killed everbody they saw, they didnt worry about civilians like we are. Also they fought an army unlike us which we are fighting cowarldy people who hide behind desguises while our guys are out there in uniform clear targets.

6. Sadaam would have let anybody in who he thought would give him more power. The terrorist and him had the same agenda. The taliban and Al'Queda have various leaders from different countries and they are a ruthless people who arnt afraid to kill so what says they wont kill the higher people to get to the top???

7. people are getting water and electricity that never had it before, just the liberal news media wont tell you that. the towns in the country side never had running water or electricity before but now they do. Also sadaam killed all those that opposed him. not a very good thing.

8. While a few may say they want to go back to Sadaam they are most likely those that would benifit politically or financially from his coming back to power. There are tons of people out there voting with risk of death just becuase they want and free Iraq. There are Iraqis driving like 12 or more hours to go vote in the US just because they want freedom so badly thats how much they didnt like Sadaam. There is actually a woman running too. If you saw the ballot under Sadaam either yes for Sadaam or no for him, and a no ment secret police showed up and probably killed you.

9. This is not a second vietnam, Iraq is not a failure, and Veitnam wasnt one either except the media made it out to be. if we would have supported the troops then instead of spitting on them maybe they would have been a little more willing to do their jobs. If we would have gone in their strong in the first it would have been better.

10. as for the oil, it would be a whole lot easier and cheaper and politically positive to just buy oil from Opec or another country than to go to war with Iraq. We have oil in alaska but the dems wont let us get to it as they think it would harm the environment, in fact last time they drilled there the caraboo or similar species increased tremediously becuase of the drilling

etherkye · #5 (**permalink**) 30 Jan 2005, 17:45

Quote: